The difference — same meeting, one change
Before: "Any questions?" — silence, two polite 👍 reactions. After: six anonymous messages nobody would have said out loud, reactions piling up, real problems on the table.
A bot joins your Teams or Zoom meeting and gives everyone in the room an anonymous voice — live, in the chat, completely outside your company's systems.
Live demo — what it looks like in a real Teams meeting
↑ Messages appear live as participants text or click the link
Before: "Any questions?" — silence, two polite 👍 reactions. After: six anonymous messages nobody would have said out loud, reactions piling up, real problems on the table.
The one that happens in the room. And the one that happens in the parking lot afterward — where people actually say what they think.
No app to install. No account to create. No second screen to manage.
You invite NotOnRecord like any other meeting participant. It joins Teams or Zoom and immediately posts its entry message to the meeting chat.
Anyone in the meeting grabs their phone and texts the number — or clicks the link. No login. No account. Takes 10 seconds.
Their message shows up instantly: 💬 Anonymous: [message]. Identity stripped before relay. No log connects person to message.
Text from your personal phone. One dashed arrow later — Anonymous: "I think the timeline is unrealistic and nobody wants to say it." The thing that needed saying, said.
This isn't a privacy policy. It's the architecture. There is no database to subpoena. No log that connects a person to a message. That's not a claim — it's how the system is built.
NotOnRecord does not join the audio or video of your meeting. We have no access to what is said, shared, or discussed. We only post to the meeting chat — outbound only.
Anonymous messages are relayed in memory and never written to disk. When the meeting ends, the session is cleared. There is no record — not even on our servers. That's by design.
Phone numbers and IP addresses are stripped on receipt — before the message is processed. No log is created that maps a sender to their message. We couldn't identify the sender even if compelled.
If we receive a valid legal order, we can produce: the organizer's account email, the time a session was active, and the number of messages relayed. We cannot produce message content, sender identity, or any link between the two — because that data was never created. A subpoena cannot compel us to produce records that do not exist.
Person → NotOnRecord relay → Anonymous message posted. Corporate cloud never in the loop.
Every other anonymous tool either lives inside your corporate ecosystem — where IT can see it — or requires a separate app nobody opens mid-meeting.
| Feature | NotOnRecord | Slido / Pigeonhole | Anonymous surveys |
|---|---|---|---|
| Works inside meeting chat | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Outside corporate infrastructure | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Real-time (not async) | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ |
| No app install required | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Zero eDiscovery exposure | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Works on participant's personal phone | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ |
The organizer pays. The 20 people in the meeting don't. Simple.
Join the waitlist. We're onboarding teams now.
✓ You're on the list. We'll be in touch.